Rising housing costs in major metro areas have made it harder than ever for federal employees to balance their budgets. Markets like Washington, D.C., San Francisco, and New York City — where many agencies are headquartered — have seen home prices and rents soar well beyond the pace of government pay increases.
For both new hires and mid-career Feds, the gap between income and housing costs is creating a housing crisis that affects financial stability, recruitment, and retention.
Understanding the Pay vs. Housing Gap
Locality pay was designed to narrow the difference between federal salaries and private-sector wages in expensive areas. While it helps, it often doesn’t keep pace with the rapid escalation of rents and mortgages in hot housing markets. Entry-level and early-career employees are especially vulnerable, as their pay bands are capped and leave little room to stretch.
Even specialized positions requiring advanced skills can face salary ceilings that make affording safe and stable housing a challenge.
The result is a growing disparity: Affordable housing for federal employees is increasingly out of reach, and federal employee housing assistance is limited compared with the scale of increasing housing costs.
Beyond financial stress, this dynamic also makes it harder to recruit and retain top talent in agencies that serve critical missions.
Practical Housing Strategies for Federal Employees
Despite these pressures, there are steps Feds can take to manage housing costs:
- Shared housing or longer commutes: While not ideal, roommates or suburban living can lower monthly costs.
- Emerging neighborhoods: Some areas offer lower prices with improving amenities, though they may require trade-offs in commute time or services.
- Agency-specific support: Certain agencies or roles (such as military positions) may offer housing stipends or allowances.
- Government-backed mortgage options: Federal Housing Administration (FHA) loans, S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) benefits, and first-time buyer programs can make homeownership more attainable.
- Relocation and telework policies: Employees may be eligible for relocation assistance or expanded remote work options, creating opportunities to live in more affordable regions.
Together, these strategies can provide federal employee housing assistance in both direct and indirect ways, easing the burden of high-cost markets.
Learn more about your retirement benefits at our No-Cost webinars, featuring Ed Zurndorfer -
Financial Planning Moves That Can Help
Budgeting carefully is critical when housing consumes such a large portion of income. A good rule of thumb is to keep housing costs under 30% of gross pay. At the same time, Feds should avoid sacrificing long-term retirement savings in the Thrift Savings Plan (TSP) entirely.
A CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ (CFP®) professional might recommend creating a “housing stability fund” — a savings cushion specifically for rent increases, emergency moves, or unexpected housing costs. Employee Assistance Programs (EAPs) and Housing and Urban Development (HUD) counseling can also connect Feds with resources specifically tailored to affordable housing for federal employees.
Long-Term Considerations
Housing markets are cyclical. Periods of layoffs, return-to-office mandates, or regional downturns can quickly shift affordability. Federal employees should revisit the rent-vs-own decision every few years as pay scales and benefits evolve.
Career mobility also matters: Some Feds may find that transferring to lower-cost regions opens both financial breathing room and new career opportunities.
Planning Ahead for Housing Security
While the challenges of today’s housing market are real, federal employees are not without options. Careful planning, awareness of federal employee housing assistance programs, and use of financial tools like the TSP can help bridge the gap. Proactive steps — from budgeting to exploring loan programs — can support financial security while continuing to serve the public.
For guidance tailored to your situation, reach out to the team at Serving Those Who Serve at [email protected].
The information has been obtained from sources considered reliable but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. Any opinions are those of Serving Those Who Serve writers and not necessarily those of RJFS or Raymond James. Any information is not a complete summary or statement of all available data necessary for making an investment decision and does not constitute a recommendation. Investing involves risk and you may incur a profit or loss regardless of strategy suggested. Every investor’s situation is unique and you should consider your investment goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon before making any investment or financial decision. Prior to making an investment decision, please consult with your financial advisor about your individual situation. While we are familiar with the tax provisions of the issues presented herein, as Financial Advisors of RJFS, we are not qualified to render advice on tax or legal matters. You should discuss tax or legal matters with the appropriate professional. **
