The mass layoffs and agency restructuring announced in 2025 have many Feds asking the same question: Is my job next? For those who’ve seen this playbook before, the signs are familiar. From the 1980s through the 1990s, waves of privatization reshaped the federal workforce, contracting out services, spinning off government functions, and forming public-private partnerships. Today, that model is reemerging under the banner of “efficiency.”
But history tells us privatization is never just about budgets. It's about people — our people — and the stakes couldn’t be higher
Lessons from Past Privatization Waves
In 1991, Harvard Business Review pointed out that while privatization delivered cost savings, streamlined operations, and sparked innovation in some areas, its success varied widely depending on how it was carried out.
In many instances, the same strategies that improved efficiency also led to reduced public access to services, widespread federal job losses, and weaker accountability when contractors replaced career civil servants.
It's worth noting that despite these recurring shifts, federal employment has remained remarkably steady — hovering around two million civilian employees since the 1960s. That consistency underscores a truth often overlooked in these debates: America still relies on its federal workforce to function.
What Federal Employees Should Expect Next
As privatization pressures grow, the impact of government outsourcing on employees is becoming more apparent.
Not every role is equally at risk, but certain sectors are more vulnerable. IT services, HR, facilities management, and healthcare administration are already showing signs of pressure. Private contractors are increasingly stepping in in these areas — not just for specialized tasks, but for core functions once handled in-house.
Watch for the warning signs:
- Contractor creep, where the number of contractors steadily grows while the number of federal employees declines
- Reduced internal hiring, with open positions either left vacant or replaced by contract roles
- Outsourcing of previously core functions, including areas like benefits administration or employee onboarding
Learn more about your retirement benefits at our No-Cost webinars, featuring Ed Zurndorfer -
Jobs focused on oversight, compliance, or national security tend to be less “privatizable.” But if your position falls in a support or administrative category, now is the time to assess your long-term stability.
If your role is privatized, benefits may not follow you. Most contractors don’t offer access to the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHB), federal retirement programs, or Thrift Savings Plan (TSP) matching. That can seriously affect your future retirement income, especially if you’re nearing eligibility thresholds.
Understanding how privatization impacts federal workers isn’t just a policy question — it’s a personal one, with real implications for your job security, benefits, and long-term career path.
Protecting Your Career in a Shifting Landscape
Whether or not your job is at risk today, it’s smart to plan. Upskilling with credentials that transfer to the private sector can help future-proof your career. So, “Plan B” opportunities can be identified in adjacent industries or state and local government roles.
If you're offered voluntary separation incentives (VSIP) or early retirement (VERA), weigh the tradeoffs carefully. And remember, you’re not alone. Connecting with Feds who’ve navigated this transition can offer insight — and reassurance.
Staying Ready Through Change
Privatization doesn’t have to mean losing control. It’s about making informed decisions and planning ahead. Review your retirement eligibility, consider how a job change might affect your TSP strategy, and speak with a fiduciary who understands federal benefits inside and out.
This isn’t the end — it’s a turning point. The more prepared you are, the more confident you can be in whatever comes next.
Reach out to the team at Serving Those Who Serve at [email protected] for personalized support and planning.
The information has been obtained from sources considered reliable but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. Any opinions are those of Serving Those Who Serve writers and not necessarily those of RJFS or Raymond James. Any information is not a complete summary or statement of all available data necessary for making an investment decision and does not constitute a recommendation. Investing involves risk and you may incur a profit or loss regardless of strategy suggested. Every investor’s situation is unique and you should consider your investment goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon before making any investment or financial decision. Prior to making an investment decision, please consult with your financial advisor about your individual situation. While we are familiar with the tax provisions of the issues presented herein, as Financial Advisors of RJFS, we are not qualified to render advice on tax or legal matters. You should discuss tax or legal matters with the appropriate professional. **
